Causes of sexual assault on college campuses Cam 2 cam sex roulette
Ever since the 1950s and ‘60s, when the fiercely liberal Warren Court—an era of the Supreme Court during which Justice Earl Warren presided as Chief Justice—dramatically expanded the rights of the accused in landmark decisions like , defendants’ rights have been associated with progressive activism.Yet that’s flipped in recent years, with Democrats overwhelmingly focused on the victims of sexual assault and Republicans overwhelmingly focused on the victimization of those accused of it.It’s important to note that Title IX protections and the campus equity systems were created to protect all students from a wide variety of predatory behaviors.These include sexual advances from professors, harassment in the college workplace, inappropriate behavior during an internship, and intimidation by advisors and other supervisors in the undergraduate and graduate classroom and degree completion process. It is wrong to reduce the problem of sexual abuse, harassment, assault, and cyberbullying to a stereotypical “he said/she said” drama with a cast of characters that only include drunk, horny college students.According to Education Secretary Betsy De Vos and the Trump administration, disability rights, hate crimes, predatory lending, or heading off an impending economic bubble rooted in student loan defaults are not the most pressing higher education matters.
“If [De Vos’s] statements were made by a different official in a different Administration,” Jeannie Suk Gersen wrote for Reactions to the interim guidelines issued on Friday have been mixed.
The education secretary’s Thursday meeting with the accused means that some damage has already been done.
But De Vos has a chance to repair the intense negative reaction she’s generated.
While colleges have historically neglected student sexual-assault victims by failing to adequately punish perpetrators, many believe the Obama administration may have gone too far with its reforms.
In 2011, Obama’s Education Department issued what’s become known as the “Dear Colleague” letter, advising universities to, among other things, apply a “preponderance of the evidence” standard when adjudicating these cases.